Income by Design

A modern framework for retirement confidence

Retirement isn’t just about how much you've saved, it’s about how confidently you can spend. Income by Design examines the shift from account balances to income strategies that support certainty, flexibility, and long-term confidence.

Read full report

The retirement equation is no longer just about saving — it’s about creating retirement certainty that delivers lifetime income and supports sustainable retirement spending.

Guardian Wealth Advanced Markets’ latest publication explores how to balance growth and guaranteed sources to stay protected, invested, and confident in a more complex environment.

A Q&A on rethinking retirement income

Guardian’s Erin Culek and BlackRock’s Nick Nefouse discuss how shifting from a focus on account balances to whole‑portfolio retirement planning can support smarter retirement spending and more dependable lifetime income.

Client spotlight

Retirement designed around life

David and Terry Katz worked with Gary Sirak and Jeff Sirak to create a bespoke plan that shifted from simple accumulation to a retirement strategy built around income, protection, and flexibility that aligned their plan with the life they want to live.

Retirement income taxes and essential expenses image

Strategic frameworks for retirement planning

An in-depth look at how retirees can build an income strategy that covers essential expenses while allowing for growth, tax efficiency, and changing priorities, and how a solid lifetime income foundation can help ensure more predictable spending throughout retirement.

Guardian Wealth Advanced Markets Spring Edition

Income by Design: A modern framework for retirement confidence

_{A letter from Mike}

Dear Clients,

Retirement planning today is no longer defined by accumulation alone. Longer lifespans, evolving markets, and the decline of traditional pensions have shifted the focus toward how wealth is translated into reliable income over time, without sacrificing the opportunity for continued growth. For many individuals and business owners, this requires moving beyond isolated decisions and toward a more deliberate approach, one that balances investments, guaranteed income, and ongoing cash flows as parts of a single, integrated retirement strategy to grow wealth while managing risk.

This publication is intended to provide clarity on that shift and the planning implications that come with it. The sections that follow explore the tools and solutions available to support retirement income in a more complex environment. In particular, they examine how market-based assets can continue to drive long-term growth, while guaranteed income sources and business or personal cash flows help manage downside risk and expenses. Through a conversation between Erin Culek, our Head of Financial Protection and Retirement Solutions, and Nick Nefouse of BlackRock, we examine why certainty, behavior, and a whole‑portfolio perspective are increasingly central to successful retirement outcomes. We then highlight one of our clients, exploring their retirement income goals and how they worked with their advisors to set them up for financial success. You will also find a practical discussion of how guaranteed income can help protect essential expenses, reduce pressure on growth assets, and support better decision‑making throughout retirement.

Our objective is straightforward: to help you evaluate retirement income decisions with greater confidence and perspective. When income planning is approached as a design exercise rather than a product choice, it becomes easier to balance stability with opportunity — to remain invested for growth while putting prudent guardrails around risk.

We hope this material serves as a useful framework for assessing your own strategy and as a foundation for ongoing, informed conversations with your financial advisor.

Sincerely,
Mike Perry
Head of Client Solutions and Wealth Management

_{Rethinking retirement income:}

Why outcomes, certainty, and behavior matter more than balances

Erin Culek
Head of Financial Protection and Retirement Solutions, Guardian
Erin is responsible for driving profitable growth in Guardian’s individual life, annuity, and disability businesses.
Nick Nefouse
Global Head of Retirement Solutions and Head of LifePath, BlackRock
Nick leads research and product strategy focused on retirement, including LifePath, BlackRock’s global target date fund franchise.

For many, retirement planning still centers around reaching a target account balance. But as retirement draws closer, that approach often falls short of answering the real question: How will I actually live on this money?

Erin Culek, Guardian’s Head of Financial Protection and Retirement Solutions, speaks with Nick Nefouse, BlackRock’s Global Head of Retirement Solutions and Head of LifePath, about why retirement success now depends less on accumulation and more on income, certainty, and behavior. Their discussion explores why people underspend in retirement, how guaranteed income can change decision-making, and why an outcomes-based, or “whole-portfolio,” approach is increasingly essential for better outcomes.

Erin: BlackRock has conducted extensive research on retirement in America. What are the primary takeaways from what you’ve learned?

Nick: There are three main misunderstandings about retirement we see. First, people tend to focus on how much wealth they’ll have at a certain age, rather than how they’re actually going to fund spending in retirement. That disconnect becomes most obvious when people shift from saving to spending. It’s where confidence can break down, and underspending can occur, even when balances look strong.

Second, we as an industry talk a lot about longevity risk, but most people don’t understand it and don’t want to talk about their own mortality. What actually resonates is certainty. Telling someone they’ll have a paycheck for the rest of their life is much more meaningful than telling them how long they might live. This is why outcomes-based whole-portfolio planning is so important. Prepare people for what they care about: reliable income they can plan around, and then build the rest of the strategy from there.

Third, retirement isn’t a single date. It’s a window of time. We treat it like a graduation, but in reality many people retire earlier than they planned for reasons outside their control, like health, a spouse’s health, or workforce changes. Planning for flexibility and stress‑testing different retirement start dates help ensure people are ready even if retirement happens sooner than expected.

Erin: You used the phrase “whole-portfolio planning.” What does that mean in practice, and why does it matter, particularly for high-net-worth individuals?

Nick: Whole-portfolio planning starts with the outcome, not the product. The question isn’t “Should I or shouldn’t I use insurance?” It’s “What outcome am I trying to achieve, and how do I structure the entire portfolio to support that?” Insurance, investments, and fixed income aren’t good or bad on their own. Used the right way, they improve outcomes. Used poorly, they don’t.

For most high-net-worth individuals, the goal isn’t to maximize wealth at all costs. It’s to maintain quality of life and grow above inflation. At that level, the biggest risk is a large downside event that changes behavior. Insurance and annuities are particularly powerful because they help manage left tail risk, meaning the truly catastrophic outcomes. By reshaping risk, whole-portfolio construction allows people to stay invested, stay disciplined, and focus on durable outcomes instead of short-term volatility.

Erin: You’ve said the transition from saving to spending is where many people struggle. Where does that break down?

Nick: We don’t educate people on spending. We educate them on saving, and the entire system reinforces that more money is always better. That creates unintended consequences. People anchor to the high-water mark in their portfolio, and when markets move, behavior changes. Someone may feel comfortable spending based on a portfolio at its peak, but when the market drops, they often cut spending or delay retirement decisions because they feel like they’ve “lost” money, even if the plan is still workable long-term.

We also over-index on wealth maximization instead of outcomes as the goal. When portfolio values fall, people feel worse and spend less, even if their ability to fund retirement hasn’t actually changed. That’s why reframing matters. If you could show people something like a funded status, or how close they are to meeting their retirement income goal, it would be far more useful than just showing an account balance.

Erin: And you’ve spoken about how much people underspend in retirement. Why does that happen?

Nick: People underspend because they don’t know how to spend. There’s a real scarcity mentality in retirement. There’s a fear of running out of money. And that fear leads people to significantly underspend. The issue isn’t that people die with money; it’s that they don’t enjoy their retirement, because they’re uncertain.

Guaranteed income inherently helps change that. When people know a portion of their income is secure, they’re more comfortable spending. They can budget. They can plan. It gives them confidence, and that confidence changes behavior in a very real way.

Erin: Despite that, guaranteed income adoption remains low. What’s holding people back?

Nick: This isn’t a product problem. It’s a narrative problem. If you talk to people in retirement who have guaranteed income and ask them what they want, they’ll say more guaranteed income. If you ask people who don’t have it, they’ll say they want it. But if you ask people in their late 50s or early 60s whether they want an annuity, they’ll often say no due to misconceptions.

There’s a disconnect there. When people understand the guaranteed income that annuities provide allows them to spend more confidently in retirement, the conversation changes. We need to continue telling that story.

Erin: How do you see the role of advice evolving as people approach retirement?

Nick: Advice is critical. And honestly, the more technology we use, the clearer that becomes. While models, algorithms, and digital tools can provide information and recommendations at scale, most decisions aren’t driven by technology alone. They’re driven by someone they trust telling them it’s okay. You can read the same information on a screen, but hearing it from a human changes behavior.

We see this very clearly when it comes to income solutions and insurance. When advice is present, adoption is dramatically higher. It’s not because the information is different. It’s because someone is there to provide context and reassurance.

Erin: What about small business owners, who often don’t have access to traditional retirement plans?

Nick: Access matters a lot. When people have access to well-designed retirement solutions — diversified, low-cost, professionally managed — the outcomes are actually quite good.

For small business owners, simplicity and structure are critical. Solutions that handle allocation, rebalancing, and the transition from accumulation to income can make a real difference, especially when paired with advice.

Erin: Looking ahead, how do you think retirement planning will evolve over the next decade?

Nick: I think you’ll see income and protection become more embedded in retirement planning, rather than treated as optional or separate decisions.

More broadly, the industry is moving toward holistic planning, where investments, insurance, and income are considered together. When people have more certainty, they make better decisions. They stay invested longer. And they experience retirement with far less anxiety.

Erin: Final takeaway. What should clients and advisors focus on?

Nick: Retirement planning isn’t about hitting a number. It’s about creating certainty. When you focus on outcomes and use the whole portfolio, including guaranteed income, to support those outcomes, you give people the confidence to actually live their retirement. And that’s what matters most.

_{Client spotlight:}

Retirement, designed around life

Clients
David and Terry Katz
Background: David is a retired pediatrician and former practice owner; Terry spent her career in the nonprofit sector.
Planning priorities: Creating dependable retirement income, reducing financial stress, creating generational wealth, and aligning their finances with the life they want to live in retirement.
Long-term goals: Planning for longevity while also protecting legacy and supporting future generations, including college savings for their grandchildren.
Advisors
Gary Sirak and Jeff Sirak
Relationship: Working with David and Terry Katz since 2001.
Approach: Holistic planning that starts with the whole person — values, goals, and vision for life after work.
Strategy focus: Integrating protection, annuity-based retirement income, growth, and legacy planning with whole life insurance to support confidence, flexibility, and long-term sustainability.
Team: The Sirak Financial team, including Lisa Fleming, Raquel Thompson, Tara Gordan, and Nikki Baldwin, help deliver a great experience

^{Gary Sirak, CLU®, ChFC®, Financial Advisor, Sirak Financial}

^{Gary leads a third‑generation family financial firm, helping clients protect their families, businesses, and assets.}

^{Jeff Sirak CLU®, ChFC®, RICP®, Financial Advisor, Sirak Financial}

^{Jeff designs holistic financial plans for individuals and business owners, bringing deep expertise in retirement income, insurance, and investment strategy.}

How David and Terry Katz partnered with financial advisors Gary Sirak and Jeff Sirak to align income, protection, and long-term goals — and build a retirement that reflects how they want to live.

When David and Terry Katz first began working with Gary Sirak, they were looking for clarity. Years of conflicting advice had left them uncertain about where to start, even though they knew they needed help getting their finances in order and developing a more intentional retirement income strategy.

From the outset, Gary approached the Katz situation holistically — focusing first on protection and personal goals, then layering in growth, annuity-based retirement income, and generational planning strategies to support both the life they wanted to live and the legacy they hoped to leave.

Building the foundation: Protection first

Early on, the priority was clear. David and Terry were under protected, with gaps in life insurance coverage that left their financial foundation exposed. Gary worked closely with the couple to establish a strong protection foundation, creating a base for long-term wealth and retirement planning that would eventually support more predictable retirement spending.

As the years progressed, the focus expanded beyond protection to provide them much needed structure to their retirement readiness, income, and legacy plans. David, a pediatrician and former practice owner, and Terry, a longtime nonprofit professional, wanted a plan that would support a comfortable retirement and help ensure reliable lifetime income, while giving them the freedom to enjoy the life they had worked hard to build.

A new definition of retirement success

One of the most important shifts in their planning journey was redefining what “success” meant. Early conversations revealed a common tension: the desire for strong returns without risk. Through ongoing dialogue, Gary, and later Jeff, helped the couple prioritize financial confidence and consistency over chasing performance.

Rather than focusing solely on accumulation, the strategy centered on turning savings into a reliable source of retirement income — using annuities to create predictable lifetime income alongside market-based growth, so they could enjoy retirement without constant financial stress or worry affecting their retirement spending.

Focusing on outcomes, not labels

The couple was initially wary of annuities, shaped by negative perceptions they had heard over the years. Gary and Jeff shifted their focus to the outcomes that mattered most to them: predictable income, reduced volatility, and long-term confidence.

By using annuities to secure portions of their retirement income for specific time horizons, David and Terry were able to separate essential income from assets earmarked for growth and flexibility — reinforcing a diversified retirement income strategy designed to balance protection and adaptability.

Income, longevity, and legacy — working together

Longevity has been a central consideration throughout the planning process. Gary and Jeff incorporated annuities to help ensure retirement income would last for the couple’s entire lives, while preserving flexibility for growth and legacy planning. Whole life insurance also played a key role, giving them confidence to enjoy retirement knowing their family would be taken care of regardless of how long they live. At the same time, Gary and Jeff helped them think beyond their own retirement, incorporating multigenerational planning, including college savings for their grandchildren.

Now fully retired — with the flexibility to pursue low-stress work by choice rather than necessity — David and Terry are living the retirement they envisioned. Their plan continues to adapt as their needs evolve, supported by an ongoing advisory relationship rooted in collaboration, continuity, and a deep understanding of how they want to live. And while others worry about market swings, David and Terry Katz say they sleep well at night knowing their income is designed to last and support consistent retirement spending through every stage of retirement.

“We sleep well at night knowing our retirement income will last our whole lives — and that the planning we’ve done will take care of our family when we’re gone.”
David and Terry Katz
“Our planning starts with the life our clients want to live in retirement — not the money. Once you understand that, the financial strategy becomes a way to support that life, not the other way around.”
Gary Sirak

What should clients ask their financial advisor?

To ensure a holistic approach to retirement planning, clients should consider asking:

Can you provide a comprehensive, 30,000-foot view of my plan — showing how everything fits together today, five years from now, and 10 years from now?
How does my plan account for longevity and the risk of running out of money?
How do income strategies, investments, and protection work together as part of one coordinated plan?
How are fees structured across different strategies, and how will I understand what I’m paying for?
How often will we meet, and how easy is it to reach you — and your broader team — when questions come up?

Retirement income, taxes, and essential expenses:

Incorporating flexibility and guarantees to promote efficiency

_{Jim Magner}

Retirement income looks different today

One of the most consequential decisions facing individuals and families today is determining how much income is needed in retirement — and whether enough assets are available to meet that need through a well‑structured retirement income strategy. Longer lifespans, increased market volatility, and the decline of traditional pensions mean that sufficient income is no longer automatically delivered, it must be intentionally designed to support sustainable retirement spending and long‑term financial security.

For high‑net‑worth individuals and business owners, this challenge is magnified by uneven cash flows, concentrated equity exposure, and tax complexity following a liquidity event such as the sale of a business, all of which have direct implications for creating reliable lifetime income.

Start with clarity: What needs to be funded — and how flexible is it?

An effective retirement income strategy begins with clarity around spending. Not all expenses carry the same importance or tolerance for risk, and distinguishing between them provides the foundation for informed decisions later on. To adequately plan, you must assess:

Essential expenses that must be met regardless of markets.
Lifestyle expenses that can adjust over time as part of flexible retirement spending.
Irregular or one‑time expenses that require liquidity and planning.

The anchor strategy: Build an income floor so the portfolio can do its job

An income floor represents the portion of retirement income designed to support essential expenses with a high degree of reliability to reduce dependence on portfolio withdrawals during volatile periods or when the market is down, a key factor in stabilizing long‑term retirement spending. The income floor separates an investor’s financial security from market uncertainty, and it can be created in different ways, including pensions, cash or bond ladders, and other predictable income sources. The appropriate structure depends on an investor’s goals, risk tolerance, tax profile, and liquidity needs, but the goal remains clear: create enough guaranteed income so the rest of the strategy can be built with greater flexibility.

Many consider Social Security first when thinking of guaranteed income. But, for affluent retirees, Social Security often represents a relatively small portion of total income and must be heavily supplemented. However, benefit timing can materially influence taxation by interacting with earned income, portfolio withdrawals, and provisional income rules. As a result, Social Security planning for wealthy households is less about income replacement and more about tax coordination within a broader retirement income strategy.

Key tax considerations when entering your 60s

The 3.8% net investment income tax (NIIT): A 3.8% tax that applies to investment income, once modified adjusted gross income exceeds applicable thresholds.
Capital gain taxes: Long-term capital gains, while taxed at lower rates than ordinary income, can push you into a higher effective tax bracket if poorly timed.
Social Security taxation: Up to 85% of your SSI benefits can become taxable if your provisional income exceeds certain thresholds. Withdrawals from IRAs, realized capital gains, and even tax-exempt interest can increase provisional income, reducing the after-tax value of benefits.

Because each additional dollar of income can affect multiple tax calculations simultaneously, retirement income sources do not operate independently. Coordinated income planning seeks to manage taxes thoughtfully across retirement rather than minimizing them in any single year.

Single premium immediate annuities (SPIAs) are another vehicle for creating guaranteed income. When funded with after‑tax assets, a portion of each payment is typically treated as a return of principal, which can help limit the incremental taxable income created. By covering a portion of essential expenses, income from a SPIA can reduce the need to sell investments or take larger IRA withdrawals during tax‑sensitive years, supporting more stable retirement spending in varying market environments.

It is important to note that this approach can be very flexible and does not have to be all or nothing. The structure and duration of guaranteed income can be matched to the specific income need, helping retirees create a personalized lifetime income foundation.

The structure of an income floor should reflect how an individual transitions into retirement, supporting the shift from accumulation to retirement spending in a balanced and sustainable way:

For an entrepreneur who continues to earn income after selling a business, guaranteed income may be used for a defined period, helping bridge income needs until earned income declines further or Social Security can be claimed without temporary benefit reductions that apply when income exceeds certain thresholds before full retirement age.
For others, such as a retiring executive who fully exits their profession, guaranteed income may be designed to last for life, replacing a paycheck immediately and providing long‑term stability.

In both cases, guaranteed lifetime income is not a tax‑free solution, but it can improve coordination by allowing other assets to be taxed more intentionally over time.

Retirement income inventory

Guaranteed income is one of several tools that may be used to create your income floor for essential expenses. Once that foundation is established, the next step is understanding how all remaining income sources fit together — while considering liquidity needs, tax situation, and long-term objectives that support sustainable retirement spending and reliable lifetime income.

A useful starting point is to inventory expected sources of retirement income using the checklist below as a starting point. For affluent households, income often comes from multiple sources with differing levels of predictability, flexibility, and tax treatment. The objective is not to rely on any single source, but to understand how they may work together over time to support a coordinated retirement income strategy that adapts to changing needs.

More predictable / Stable	More flexible / Variable
Guaranteed income (pension or SPIA)	Earned or consulting income
Social Security	Portfolio withdrawals
Other predictable income sources	Portfolio income (dividends and interest)
no	Trust distributions
no	Cash value life insurance access

Designing retirement income over time: A laddered approach

For many high‑net‑worth individuals and business owners, guaranteed income can be most effective when structured in layers — aligned to how earned income changes, when Social Security begins, and how tax considerations evolve over time. A laddered approach allows retirees to add reliability intentionally, where it supports the plan most.

Example: Entrepreneurial business owner

Earned income often continues, but at a reduced and uneven level.
A smaller layer of immediate guaranteed income can help bridge the gap between lower earnings and essential spending.
Later layers may begin as earned income declines further, shifting focus to longevity protection.

Example: Retiring executive

Earned income ends at retirement, creating an immediate income gap.
An initial layer of guaranteed income can begin right away to cover essential expenses.
Additional income can be added later to protect against longevity and health care costs.

Retirement income roadmap

Confirm essential expenses and target income stability.
Coordinate Social Security and earned income expectations.
Determine the timing and scale of guaranteed income additions.
Use the early retirement years intentionally.

Review the strategy annually (or after major life or tax changes) to reassess spending, tax brackets, Social Security timing, and withdrawal sequencing.

Why sequencing matters

The illustration highlights how income design can differ meaningfully even when goals are the same. A retiring professional who fully exits their career may rely more heavily on immediate guaranteed income to replace a paycheck and support essential expenses. By contrast, an entrepreneur who continues to earn income — often unevenly — may use a smaller initial layer of guaranteed income to supplement cash flow and support more flexible retirement spending, deferring other sources until later.

For many affluent individuals, the years between a liquidity event — such as the sale of a business — and required minimum distributions (currently age 73 for IRAs) represent a particularly important planning window structuring lifetime income. Income during this period is often lower and more controllable, creating opportunities to coordinate taxes deliberately through strategies such as Roth conversions, capital‑gain management, and intentional withdrawal planning.

By covering a portion of essential expenses with guaranteed income during these years, retirees may reduce the need to sell investments or take larger tax‑deferred withdrawals. When funded with after‑tax assets, a portion of each payment is typically treated as a return of principal, which can help limit incremental taxable income.

These examples are intended to make one point clear: Guaranteed income can be integrated into a retirement income strategy to solve specific needs — near‑term stability, a bridge to Social Security, or long‑term longevity protection supporting lifetime income — rather than treated as a single, permanent decision. Any approach that increases income predictability may involve trade-offs, including reduced liquidity and opportunity cost, so practical designs typically preserve readily accessible reserves for unexpected needs and changing priorities.

Guaranteed income and investments

Once reliable income is in place, the role of the remaining investment portfolio can change in meaningful ways. Rather than being designed primarily to generate cash flow, these assets may be positioned with greater flexibility around growth, risk management, and long-term objectives.

When portfolios are relied upon to fund day-to-day spending, investment decisions are often constrained by income needs. This can result in an emphasis on yield-oriented strategies, forced sales during market downturn, or a reluctance to tolerate short-term volatility. By contrast, when essential expenses are supported by predictable income sources as part of a structured retirement income strategy, the investment portfolio may no longer need to serve as the primary vehicle for retirement spending.

This shift can create several planning advantages.

Greater alignment with the investor’s risk profile: With income needs addressed elsewhere, investment strategy can be more closely aligned with the investor’s true risk tolerance, time horizon, and long-term goals.
Reduced pressure to generate yield: When portfolios are not required to produce consistent income, there may be less emphasis on yield alone, allowing for broader diversification across asset classes and incorporating those that may offer lower current income but greater long-term growth potential.
Improved tax coordination: Separating income stability from investment growth can also improve tax coordination. Portfolio withdrawals, capital gains realization, and tax-efficient asset placement can be managed more intentionally when they are not dictated by spending needs.
Flexibility as priorities evolve: Retirement is not static. Structuring income and investments separately can provide flexibility to adapt as circumstances evolve, by adjusting investment risk, changing withdrawal strategies, or reallocating assets.

Ultimately, this approach is not about maximizing returns or minimizing risk in isolation. It is about creating a structure in which reliable income supports essential needs, while investments are positioned in a way that reflects the investor’s broader financial picture.

Confidence comes from coordination

In a retirement landscape shaped by uncertainty, the most effective retirement income strategies combine structure with flexibility to support lifetime income and long‑term retirement spending needs. Reliable income is not about eliminating risk, it is about creating space for better decisions across investments, taxes, and lifestyle. When income sources are aligned thoughtfully through a coordinated retirement income strategy, wealthy individuals gain greater clarity, control, and confidence in the years ahead.

Why is retirement planning shifting from account balances to income?

Retirement planning is increasingly focused on income because people are living longer, facing more market ups and downs, and relying less on traditional pensions. Simply building a big nest egg isn’t enough anymore — what matters is how reliably your savings can generate income that lasts in retirement, which is the core goal of any retirement income strategy.

What is whole-portfolio retirement planning?

Whole-portfolio retirement planning is an outcomes-based retirement income strategy that integrates income, protection, investments, and taxes into one system. It begins with the desired outcome — not the product — and reshapes risk so people can focus on long-term durability rather than short-term volatility. By viewing insurance, investments, and fixed income as complementary tools rather than standalone solutions, this approach shifts the focus from the size of one’s wealth to how effectively it can generate reliable income over time.

What is an income floor, and why does it matter in retirement?

An income floor is the part of your retirement income strategy designed to reliably cover essential expenses, helping you avoid withdrawing from investments during market downturns. By using predictable sources — such as pensions, annuities, cash or bond ladders, and other guaranteed income tools — you can create a lifetime income foundation tailored to your goals, risk tolerance, tax profile, and liquidity needs. With this stable base in place, the rest of your portfolio can be invested more flexibly to support long‑term growth while still accommodating taxes, liquidity, and evolving priorities.

Why do many retirees spend less than they can afford?

When markets fall, retirees often reduce retirement spending out of fear even when their long‑term outlook hasn’t changed. When a portion of your income is guaranteed, you can naturally feel more comfortable spending with confidence.

How should a retirement income strategy adapt over time?

A strong retirement income strategy should evolve as your life does. Separating income sources from investments gives you flexibility to adjust retirement spending, investment risk, and withdrawal methods over time. Annual check‑ins help you reassess taxes, account withdrawals, Social Security timing, and alignment with long‑term objectives — ensuring your plan continues to support sustainable lifetime income.

About Guardian Wealth Advanced Markets

A team with over 255 cumulative years’ experience in advanced planning for individuals, businesses, and wealth transfer, Guardian Wealth Advanced Markets serves as an in-house expert to Guardian’s financial advisors. They provide real-time insights, counsel, commentary, and resources that enable our financial advisors to support every facet of clients’ financial lives, from business, family, legacy, and protection to liquidity and retirement.

Get report

Download the report

Download

Guardian Wealth Advanced Markets (“GWAM”) provides support to financial advisors in connection with complex planning strategies, including but not limited to estate planning concepts, tax-efficient investment strategies, insurance-based planning, business succession considerations, and wealth transfer techniques. GWAM professionals act in an educational capacity only and do not provide any legal, tax, investment advice, or brokerage services. The views presented in this publication are not intended as a specific recommendation or solicitation of any security, strategy, product, or service. Views expressed reflect current conditions as of publication and may change without notice. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. This material is intended for general public use. By providing this content, The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, and their affiliates and subsidiaries are not undertaking to provide advice or recommendations for any specific individual or situation, or to otherwise act in a fiduciary capacity. Please contact a financial representative for guidance and information that is specific to your individual situation.

Guardian Wealth Advanced Markets is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or separate legal entity. Guardian Wealth Advanced Markets is a division of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian”) that provides consultative services for Guardian and its affiliates The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc., and Berkshire Life Insurance Company of America. Guardian and their insurance-affiliated entities are licensed to do business in all 50 states. Not all products and services are available in all states. Securities products and investment advisory services are provided by Park Avenue Securities LLC, a FINRA-registered broker-dealer and SEC-registered investment adviser, and Park Avenue Investment Advisory, LLC, an SEC-registered investment adviser. All accounts and services are subject to the terms and conditions of the respective underlying entities. The terms “planning”, “financial planner”, “financial advisor”, or “advisor” are used generically and are not references to providing investment planning or advisory services in each instance. Only planners or advisors who hold the requisite investment advisory registration can provide investment advisory planning services.

This material does not constitute a recommendation by BlackRock, Inc. or its affiliates ("BlackRock"), or an offer to sell, or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities, product or service, in any jurisdiction to any person. The information is not intended to provide investment advice. BlackRock does not guarantee the suitability or potential value of any particular investment. This is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution would be unlawful under securities laws of such jurisdiction.

Park Avenue Securities, LLC (PAS) is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America .

Park Avenue Investment Advisory, LLC., (PAA) is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America. PAS and PAA are located at 10 Hudson Yards, New York, NY 10001.

Variable annuities and their underlying variable investment options are sold by prospectus only. Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before investing. This and other information are contained in the prospectus or summary prospectus, if available, which may be obtained from your investment professional. Please read it before you invest or send money.

The primary feature of whole life insurance is the death benefit. All whole life insurance policy guarantees are subject to the timely payment of all required premiums and the claims-paying ability of the issuing insurance company. Policy loans and withdrawals affect the guarantees by reducing the policy’s death benefit and cash values.

Annuity guarantees are backed exclusively by the strength and claims-paying ability of the issuing insurance company. BlackRock is not affiliated with Guardian or its subsidiaries. Their opinions are their own and are subject to change without notice.

Not a Deposit | Not FDIC or NCUA Insured | May Lose Value | No Bank or Credit Union Guarantee